| Coastal Surface Water Quality & Quality Issues Related to Watershed Land Uses
 
 (1.) Historically, land-based activities within coastal watersheds have altered drainage patterns
 and volumes, which is believed to have significantly affected the concentration and distribution 
 of waterborne chemical pollutants, salinity, and nutrients.  In addition to point and non-point
  source pollution, deposits of air contaminants (nitrogen, sulfur dioxide, and mercury) from
   coal-burning power plants and other sources add to these problems. Some 60% of Georgia's 
   land area drains into the five coastal river systems.
 
 (2.) Filling and draining of wetlands for forestry and land-development in the region have reduced 
the slow-release function of fresh water wetlands - which causes greater extremes (highs and lows) 
in flow volumes.  Further, a recent analysis based on hydrological modeling of the lower Altamaha 
River estimates that groundwater outflow of nearly 2 million gallons a day of freshwater has been 
lost due to reduced artesian pressure in underlying aquifers, caused by excessive withdrawal in the
 area.
 
 (3.) Local governments, which retain exclusive authority to make decisions about the location, type,
 sequence, and proximity (density) of land development, have little capability to predict or evaluate
  the consequences of development in terms of non-point source pollution or drainage flow volume and 
  distribution.  Local development regulatory staff is often severely limited in capacity and 
  technical qualifications. Moreover, their decisions are made without the benefit of having the 
  means for systemic assessment throughout an entire watershed, nor is there adequate understanding 
  of the need for it.
 
 (4.)State environmental protection is limited to permit review of activities affecting 
'state waters' on a case-by-case basis, including no reliable or consistent procedure for
 assessing the cumulative, interactive, and long-term effects of individual permits.  Only
  about 10% of state waters are sampled, and 60% of these fail to meet federal 'fishable and 
  swimmable' standards.
 
 (5.) Water quality monitoring is deficient, both in geographic dispersion and pollutant screening. 
 The EPA National Watershed Assessment reports that data for 3 of 7 key water-quality indicators are
  "insufficient" for coastal Georgia rivers; missing data includes information about toxins known to
   be harmful to humans and wildlife.  At the same time, federal funding for surface water testing 
   is being cut.
 
 (6.) Commercial fishing, a major source of employment in the region, is confronting a gradual but 
significant reduction in the productivity of coastal waters.  Harvest of blue crab and brown shrimp
 are in severe decline, indicated by the most recent 10-year average being at least 50% below the
  average annual yield for the previous 30 years.  Recent failure of the Georgia shrimp harvest is 
  blamed on drought, but it is certainly worsened by various human activities that reduce fresh-water
   flow and quality.
 
 (7.) With adequate research, more information about the current conditions of coastal waters in terms
 of compromised water quality and altered flow (and their causes) can help improve policies and 
 procedures needed to achieve greater accountability and capability for controlling these problems. 
  An in-depth study is needed to determine the content and sequencing of related research and to 
  estimate the time, funding requirements, and alternative funding sources available to complete it.
 
 (8.) The currency, comprehensiveness, and accuracy of data are essential to support accountable, 
consistent, proactive decisions to advance the effectiveness of both local and state government 
actions.  This includes revisions in the practices of all levels of government and in the means for
 coordinating their activities to achieve common objectives for managing natural resources in the 
 public interest.  (Refer to the Performance Audit for the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Program,
  September 2001.)
 
 (9.) These benefits will enhance the protection of water resources for critical needs in relation 
to public health and water supply, recreational activities, wildlife habitat, and regionally 
important resource-based economic activities, including commercial fishing and tourism.  Nature-based
 business is estimated to support one out of every five jobs in the coastal Georgia region, worth at
  least $1 billion annually.
 
 (10.) Without a substantial effort to improve management of water resources, further decline in 
coastal fisheries can be expected, with related risks to public health caused by increased potential
 for: nutrient-loading; eutrophication, low dissolved oxygen; rising concentration of contaminants 
 in water, sediments, and fish/shellfish; increased salinity; and episodic proliferation of algae and
  opportunistic parasites, some of which have the ability to produce deadly neurotoxins.
 |